Harassment, hogwash and human rights abuses at Hammertime

Smash EDO’s Hammertime protest on 13th October saw a return to kettling, mass arrests and draconian policing. Proving finally the post G20 honeymoon is over, Sussex police clearly showed it was business as usual in attempting to repress, intimidate and harass protesters.

Before the protest had even begun, over 100 police surrounded the convergence centre where people were staying and attempted to escort them to the designated protest area in a mobile kettle, demanding masks be removed. Protesters were assured there was no need to mask up as the police wouldn’t be taking photographs. Unsurprisingly, this was a lie, and within half an hour, a fitwatcher had spotted Ian Skivens standing on top of a hill taking photographs with a very long lens, and FIT officers were prevalent throughout the demo.

Despite several valiant efforts to break away, kettling was the theme of the day. There were a number of small kettles throughout the day with many protesters split up. Understandably, people are keen to avoid being contained and run. Unfortunately, this inevitably leads to the cops splitting us into smaller and smaller groups, allowing them to control us and losing the advantage of working together as a bloc, and we need to look at strategies to deal with this.

In a preventative policing strategy reminiscent of Copenhagen, every person was arrested for breach of the peace in one kettle, including a fourteen year old, a legal observer and a photographer. The people arrested were not committing a breach of the peace. They were sitting down – some had been trying to leave the protest. Emily Walker, from the Brighton Argus, not normally known for their sympathy for the campaign, reported on their live blog “The people being arrested from the kettle off Lewes Road for “breach of the peace” are simply sitting on the floor.” In total there were 53 arrests, with the 46 arrested for breach of the peace all released without charge.

Meanwhile Sussex police went on a PR offensive, mostly through their Twitter feed. It was almost as if they believed that if they cited “disruption” enough times, the fact they had blatantly trampled over the human rights of protesters would be ignored. This coupled with overplaying the threat of the nasty protesters to the local community – even claiming they had sent a police liaison officer to a local school – meant they could play the friendly faces of law and order who would have facilitated protest had the pesky protesters negotiated with them in advance. Hailing the operation a success, they claimed “Effective policing minimises disruption to locals during Brighton protest.”

However, like so many police statements, closer examination reveals inconsistencies. In a press release the following day, Chief Superintendent Bartlett stated, “There were more arrests this time than in previous years to prevent additional disruption to the community.” However, at exactly the same time Emily Walker was reporting on the arrests in the kettle, Chief Inspector Taylor tweeted “All roads are currently open.”

The Twitter overdrive extended into replying to all those who criticised the policing operation. When freelance journalist, Marc Vallee, tweeted “Today I saw Smash EDO protesters – in a police kettle being denied water and use of a toilet by police officers in Brighton,” Sussex police were quick to respond with yet another erroneous statement, “Those contained for short time had police-provided toilets and water nearby at designated area. Offers to escort there declined.” However Vallee’s response that he had evidence the protesters were held for two hours and the kettle was one third of a mile away from the toilets was ignored.

Many theories have been mooted for the policing operation from revenge for the acquittal of the decommisioners, to wanting to prevent protesters returning to town when there was knowledge of an English National Alliance presence. However, it could simply be yet another incident in a long line of attempts to suppress the campaign.

Time and time again the police have shown they will use repression, violence and lies to defend corporate profit over justice and human rights. However, every time there has been repression, people have rallied and the campaign has come out stronger. Protesters have refused to be subdued and have come back fighting. This must not be an exception and it is essential to show we are not intimidated and we’re not going away.

Smash EDO are asking people who were arrested and want to take civil action against the police to get in touch – smashedo@riseup.net

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

8 Responses to Harassment, hogwash and human rights abuses at Hammertime

  1. Post Event says:

    Post event rationalisation – too few turned up and the filth were too organised. We lost – no point in spin as it only serves to make us look dishonest.
    Try again

  2. Anonymous says:

    Don’t think this is trying to spin things, just looking at how it was that the police made sure we lost. Statements like ‘too few turned up’ (while probably true!) don’t help all that much, because how few are too few? How many are enough?

    Sure we lost. We were unorganised, ran away too easy and couldn’t fight our way out of a paper bag.

    But the police tactics we faced were backed by huge resources at a massive (disproportionate?) cost to the public. And the tactics they used were of dubious legality. Isn’t that worth stating?

  3. Anonymous says:

    Don’t think this is trying to spin things. Just looking at how the police managed to win so convincingly.

    Sure we lost. We were unorganised, ran away too easy and couldn’t fight our way out of a paper bag.

    But the police had massive resources at huge (disproportionate?) cost to the public. And their tactics are of dubious legality. Isn’t that worth stating?

  4. Ron Broxted says:

    My heart goes out to the latest ALF members found guilty today. The sad thing is there is another trial shortly which will also in all probability result in further members receiving lengthy gaol sentences. Lessons must be learned about keeping video records and photographs of their raids, just how stupid is that? May I also used this comment to make it clear that I played no part in helping the plodscum nail them……..honest.

  5. Post Event says:

    Thats a blind alley as well! ‘Disproportionate’ could have been claimed but the last time Smash Edo actually smashed the factory up – so instantly they can say their actions were proportionate to the threat – it’s also imposible to claim rights to ‘peaceful protest’ once that has happened.
    In answer to ‘how many are enough’ the answer is – as many as are needed to achive your objective – if that is to be kettled and lead away then the objective was achived. I say again spin filled posts after the fact just make us look dishonest and unrealistic

  6. Anonymous says:

    “We lost” ?
    O no you didn’t,
    you cost the state a lot of money, and money that can only be attributed to providing free security services for a criminal industry.
    And if people who were affected by the policing operation, take action of a paperwork kind, that cost can be escalated. There is the demo you see, and then there is the follow ups afterwards, which are all part and parcel. If you feel that you have been physically defeated on the day, don’t just roll over, 53 arrests could cause an awful lot of paperwork;)

  7. John says:

    Breach of the Peace does not generate paperwork. It’s not even a chargeable “offence”, hence why whey were all released without charge. It’s a power the filth have to keep you somewhere until they are happy there will not be a further BOP i.e once the protest is over. So no paperwork at all – no files, no interview with solicitor etc.

  8. Pingback: [BLOCKED BY STBV] Inner West LIVE

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>